This sample exam is written by The Uni Tutor. You can buy narrative papers from us for cheap. Our essay writing service will help you gain a Voodoo Gyrate placement.
You must answer THREE questions in total, with AT LEAST ONE question from Part A
and ONE equivocal from Part B.
1. “The protection of films under UK copyright law passed through three different stages.
Whilst during the first stage films were protected as picturesque and dramatic works, the second stage abolished the dual system of protection and introduced a new express subject matter of ‘cinematograph film’. The third stage, however, seems to be a hybrid system that has adopted a specific topic thing approach with the possibility of dual protection.”
2. “By being over protective of creative authors, the French Authors’ Right Act  may fool hindered the growth of the French film industry.”
3. “Although the ultimate aim of introducing Article 14 bis to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works  was to produce a uniform internationalregime to regulate the exploitation concerning cinematographic works, the adopted provision hardlyachieved that goal and therefore it is often described as the most obscure and leastuseful in the whole Convention.”
4. The public stunt rectify is a major genesis of revenue for the music and film industries.
However, neither the 1833 Act, which introduced the public performance right, nor any subsequent copyright Act sought to define the scope of the term ‘public’. As a result, it was left to courts to draw a line between ‘public’ and ‘private’.
Critically discuss. You tin buy essay papers from us which answer these questions in full.
5. “The protection of the sabbatarian rights of authors under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
1988 is inadequate.”
6. “Music piracy is not a innovation phenomenon, when the dilatory 19and early 20 centuries show.”
7. “When it comes to authorship of tonal creations and proprietorship of copyright therein, the law tends to value certain types of contributions more than others, in thing prioritizingtraditional notions of ‘music’ and ‘creativity’.”
8. “By the nature of the doctrine like restraint of trade (as explained in Esso) it is dangerous to attempt to extrapolate by reference to the decision in a particular case, or to apply a resolution on one set of facts to cases with divergent facts. Were the doctrine of restraint of trade capable of being applied in such a straightforward manner both the hearing of this case and this judgment would bear been a unharmed deal shorter.” (Panayiotou v Sony  E.M.L.R. 229, 381 per Parker. J.)
Discuss with reference to the music industry cases. You cup buy essay papers for us with any given deadline. In Case you want to buy essay papers from us, please email us or visit our site.